乡村治,天下安。作为乡土中国的蜕变过程,乡村振兴是传统中国向现代化转型的关键议题。党的二十大勾勒了中国式现代化的宏伟愿景,乡村治理作为其基本治理单元,与国家治理现代化的政治逻辑密切相关、理论逻辑互为依托、实践逻辑高度一致。将推进乡村治理现代化视为乡村振兴战略的“必答题”,是涉及系统性、协同性的复杂工程,故而治理难度更大,治理任务更艰巨。而自治强基、法治保障、德治教化的“三治结合”治理模式,能够有效发挥互补互嵌和系统集成的优点,强化治理效能,以建构善治乡村。因此,“三治结合”的判定和构造,契合乡村治理现状,此为应对治理形势和治理挑战的核心策略。文章通过选取极具代表性的乡村地区——西昌市F村作为研究对象,基于F村三治结合助推乡村治理现代化的治理经验,以形成治理方案与实践旨向,为乡村场域确保脱贫成果与治理现代化有效衔接,进而促进乡村振兴提供理论基础和实践指南。Rural governance is crucial for national stability. As a transformation process of local China, rural revitalization is a key issue in the transition from traditional to modern China. The 20th National Congress of the Communist Party outlined a grand vision of Chinese-style modernization. Rural governance, as its basic unit, is closely related to the political logic of national governance modernization, theoretically interdependent, and highly consistent in practice. Treating the advancement of rural governance modernization as an “essential task” in the rural revitalization strategy involves a complex project with systematic and synergistic challenges, thus making governance more difficult and the tasks more arduous. The “three-in-one” governance model of autonomy, rule of law, and moral rule effectively leverages their complementary and integrated advantages, strengthens governance effectiveness, and constructs a wel
基层构成国家治理体系的根基,也是推动发展的关键所在。治理现代化的实现离不开基层建设的深化、服务流程的细化以及治理结构的优化。然而在推进基层治理体系现代化的过程中,随着国家公共行政体系的持续优化和社会监督机制的逐步实施,基层领导干部作为行政管理服务的核心,面临着市场理念的冲击、公共服务文化的更迭和公共管理方式的创新转型的挑战。这意味着承担核心责任的基层领导干部频繁面临重大压力,不仅损害心理健康,还进一步阻碍基层治理现代化进程。因此,深入探讨领导干部心理压力的研究价值、主要成因及有效缓解策略,对于为领导干部提供更优心理支持具有重要意义。解读相关文献可知,基层领导干部的心理压力诱因呈复杂多样态势发展,主要包括社群共益愿景与个人私益考量、责任的无穷性与能力的局限性、个人调适较差与疏导路径单一等诸多维度。故而当务之急是探索有效策略应对基层领导干部心理压力,提升身心健康状况。此举旨在清除基层治理现代化障碍,并打造现代治理体系的坚实基础。The grass-roots level forms the foundation of the national governance system and is the key to promoting development. The realization of governance modernization is inseparable from the deepening of grassroots construction, the refinement of service process and the optimization of governance structure. However, in the process of promoting the modernization of the grass-roots governance system, with the continuous optimization of the national public administration system and the gradual implementation of the social supervision mechanism, grass-roots leading cadres, as the core of administrative management services, are faced with the challenge of the impact of market concepts, the change of public service culture and the innovative transformation of public management methods. This means that grassroots leadi
