抗逆力,作为一种在面对逆境时展现出的适应能力和正面的心理态度,对于儿童来说具有深远的影响。考虑到抗逆力与儿童的心理状态、社交互动以及学业成绩有紧密关联,提升儿童的抗逆力对其全面成长显得尤为重要。文章采用生态系统理论视角,通过分析留守儿童与各层次社会生态系统互动过程中面临的风险因素,从而探讨提升留守儿童抗逆力的具体路径。这些路径包括构建和谐家庭环境、优化学校教育资源、提升社区服务水平、加强社会服务组织的专业性和完善国家社会政策等,旨在通过多维度的支持体系,有效增强留守儿童的抗逆力,促进其健康成长。Resilience, as an adaptive ability and positive psychological attitude demonstrated in the face of adversity, has a profound impact on children. Considering the close correlation between resilience and children’s psychological state, social interaction, and academic performance, enhancing children’s resilience is particularly important for their comprehensive growth. This article adopts the perspective of ecosystem theory to analyze the risk factors faced by left-behind children in their interaction with various levels of social ecosystems in order to explore specific paths to enhance their resilience. These paths include building a harmonious family environment, optimizing school education resources, improving community service levels, strengthening the professionalism of social service organizations, and improving national social policies, aiming to effectively enhance the resilience of left-behind children and promote their healthy growth through a multidimensional support system.
随着时代发展和科技进步,新型支付方式的不断涌现,侵财手段不断翻新。以往在传统支付方式下,盗窃罪与诈骗罪的区分都存在着不小的难度,新型支付方式的出现更是让两罪的区分变得更加的模糊复杂。但正是因为两者的区分难度大,才更加需要对两罪进行准确合理的区分。文章从三个颇受争议的案件作为切入口——臧进泉案、偷换二维码案和擅自登陆他人支付宝给他人转账案。通过对这三个案件的定性分歧和焦点争议,进行深入的分析,并说明两罪之间区分的关键因素。从盗窃罪与诈骗罪的处分行为入手,对处分意识的必要性进行分析。对于支付宝等具有支付功能的第三方软件在司法实践中能否被骗,和第三方介入时对被害人的确认都有了明确的说明。在新型支付方式下,区分盗窃罪与诈骗罪,对于司法实践中精准打击犯罪和定罪量刑,保护被害人的合法权益具有十分重要的意义。With the development of the times and the advancement of science and technology, new payment methods continue to emerge, and the means of invading money are constantly being renovated. In the past, it was difficult to distinguish the crime of theft and the crime of fraud under the traditional payment method. The emergence of new payment methods has made the distinction between the two crimes more blurred and complicated. But because the distinction between the two is difficult, it is even more necessary to make an accurate and reasonable distinction between the two crimes. This article will start with three controversial cases—the Zang Jinquan case, the case of stealing a QR code, and the case of unauthorized access to Alipay to transfer money to others. Through the qualitative differences and focal disputes in these three cases, an in-depth analysis is carried out, and the key factors that distinguish the two crimes are illustrated. Starting from the disciplinary actions of theft and fraud, the nec
