您的位置: 专家智库 > >

国家自然科学基金(0903080)

作品数:2 被引量:61H指数:2
相关作者:况丹孙睿更多>>
相关机构:重庆大学更多>>
发文基金:国家自然科学基金更多>>
相关领域:经济管理环境科学与工程更多>>

文献类型

  • 2篇中文期刊文章

领域

  • 2篇经济管理
  • 1篇环境科学与工...

主题

  • 1篇碳减排
  • 1篇碳交易
  • 1篇能源
  • 1篇能源-经济-...
  • 1篇能源消费
  • 1篇情景分析
  • 1篇交易
  • 1篇TRADIN...
  • 1篇CARBON
  • 1篇CGE模型
  • 1篇ENERGY
  • 1篇INTERV...
  • 1篇ABATEM...
  • 1篇REASON...

机构

  • 1篇重庆大学

作者

  • 1篇孙睿
  • 1篇况丹

传媒

  • 1篇中国人口·资...
  • 1篇Chines...

年份

  • 1篇2015
  • 1篇2014
2 条 记 录,以下是 1-2
排序方式:
Effect analysis of carbon trading on Economy-Energy-Environment system and calculation of reasonable carbon price intervals被引量:5
2015年
This paper constructs a 4-lier computable general equilibrium model which includes such modules as modeling carbon emission constraints and carbon trading(CT),and incorporates the cost of carbon emissions into constant elasticity of substitute production function.Under scenario settings under different carbon abatement targets,based on 2007 national social accounting matrix and related statistical data about energy consumption and carbon emission,effects on economic outputs,energy consumption,and carbon abatement are estimated and analyzed at both macro and sector level.By calculating selected novel indicators that compromise between macroeconomic opportunity cost and achievable carbon abatement,reasonable carbon price intervals are given for enhancing the robustness and liquidity of carbon market.Further,by decomposition and share-weighted methods,expected carbon abatement and energy price are measured and analyzed in details.Some results are meaningful for fundamental design of the future carbon market.Given constant energy utilization and carbon abatement technologies at the macro level,the higher the carbon price the more actual carbon abatement;the more gross domestic product loss,the less energy consumption.Accwding to the overall situation estimated for 2007 in China,the advice given is to introduce a carbon abatement target rate(R_c)of-10%,which is helpful to make carbon market stable against unexpected carbon price shocks between[6.9,35]/tC with less economic loss.According to Kaya decomposition,after introduction of carbon pricing,carbon abatement is mainly contributed by the effects of energy intensity(EI)and technical progress.Further,CT may help reduce energy consumption and induce transformation to a low-carbon energy structure.At the sector level,the introduction of CT could induce economic recession in all sectors,especially energy.However,the overall economic structure remains unchanged to some extent.CT will help reduce energy consumption in all sectors,especially energy.Overall utilization c
Rui SunDan KuangDongqin Chang
关键词:CARBONTRADINGENERGYCARBONABATEMENT
碳交易的“能源-经济-环境”影响及碳价合理区间测算被引量:56
2014年
构造纳入碳交易模块以及在生产模块CES函数中纳入碳排放成本的四层嵌套宏观经济CGE模型,采用2007年投入产出数据构造了社会核算矩阵(SAM),用以分析和评价不同总量减排目标情景下,碳价引入对宏观和产业部门层面经济产出、能源消费和碳减排的影响,以及相应合理的碳价水平,得到结论:①在宏观层面上,碳价越高,碳减排效果越显著,GDP损失越大,能源消费越少。综合考虑宏观经济损失和减排效果,确定了各情景下的最优碳价以及合理碳价区间,其中,在减排目标为10%时,碳市场能接受幅度更大的价格波动(6.9-35€/tC)冲击,宏观经济损失相对小,引入碳市场是最好的选择;参考Kaya等式的因素分解,说明碳价所引致的总碳减排效果,主要来自于能源强度效应和技术进步效应;引入碳价,不仅能够降低能源消费,还会引致能源消费结构向低碳方向调整,煤炭消费明显下降。②在产业部门层面,各产业部门特别是能源部门经济产出水平降低,但总体产业结构影响不大;对部门能源消费产生的主要影响是,能源部门和交通运输部门的能源消费总量显著下降;将部门合成能源单位利用成本分解为能源自身价格变动和碳排放成本两部分,得出合成能源单位利用成本变动主要由碳排放成本引起的结论;进一步,能源密集型部门的碳排放成本较高,同时实现的减排率也相对较高,但减排效果仍不充分,建议采取能源资源税和交通燃油税等激励政策,保持必要的能源市场价格水平,同时促进煤炭和交通领域的减排。
孙睿况丹常冬勤
关键词:CGE模型碳交易能源消费碳减排情景分析
共1页<1>
聚类工具0